Homer and Aristotle.

Raja Halwanis essay, Homer and Aristotle, examines Homers char influenceer to analyse if he could be considered pure(a) according to Aristotles beliefs. Homer does non appear very laudable when evaluated morally, especially when the focus is on his vitrine and not his coiffureions. However, in that location argon redeem qualities about Homer, which nock it unfeasible for the audition to really shun him. This quality enables the audience to touch sensation for Homer, and when we are disgusted with his thoughts and decisions at times, another one of his heartwarming actions accommodates us to love him again. Although I agree with Halwani that Homers love of life story in the face of hardships is a very admirable trait, I push with some of Aristotles criteria to be innoxious, and at that placefore, give Homer a spread more character reference than does Halwani. Halwani states that according to Aristotle, there are 4 types of character- the consummate(a), the undefiled, the incontinent, and the vicious character. The continent person has to resist his desires in piece to do the become thing. The incontinent person gives in to his desires and fails to act properly, knowing that what he is doing is misemploy. The vicious person does not save to resist his desires, and there is no weakness of will. He desires to make the morally wrong decision.

The virtuous character has and practices the virtues, character traits that compel us to act in the practiced slipway and to move in the honest ways emotionally too, and has perceptive abilities regarding the situations one is faced with. The virtuous person knows that he is performing chastely when doing the virtuous act, and does the virtuous act because he wants to do the right thing. However, I would glide by this description to include those who resist come-on to do the right thing, If you want to get a well(p) essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.