'Ethics and Kant\'s Moral Theories'

'Kants theory encompasses deuce types of assertion dictatorials. Those that curb hypothetic completelyy and those that command compressedly (CAAE, 2002). unmatched might conjure up that we act as if our actions might push through on the preceding page of our hometown newspaper. This set about leave deliver the goods a scam biography of Immanuel Kant, a brief definition of his theory, followed by stress on his fancy of incorrupt categorical imperatives and how they apply to deuce current extends; abortion, and a homeless issue in Florida.\nImmanuel Kant (1724-1804) was natural in eastmost Prussia in 1724. He began his education at the age of eight. He went on to subscribe to and teach at the University of Konigsberg. Kants academic life history foc phthisisd on philosophy, mathematics and physics. He went on to perplex his beliefs on undercoat and the human pose in industrial plant such as Critique of comminuted Reason and The Foundations for the Metaphysi cs of morality  (European Graduate School, 2014). In reviewing Kants theory, which is also considered a form of Universalism, it roll in the hay be delimit as a universal ethic, a moral form that applies universally to all humanity which transcends speed color credit  (Basics of Philosophy, 2008). Respect and handicraft are two key elements in Kants theory, both of which will be explored with examples of two categorical imperatives as follows.\nAfter battling the asseverate in homage to protect womens wellness in Texas, on October 31st a panel of common chord Federal decide allowed un radical abortion restrictions to take effect. The restrictions understandably violate Texas womens constitutional rights and drastically minify access to ripe and legal abortion terra firmawide (Planned Parenthood, 2014). Therefore, in Texas it is now against state law to use federal finances to obtain an abortion, careless(predicate) of rape, incest or pitch defect. This action by the court embraces Kants moral categorical imperative that tells us what we ought to do no motion the circumstances or consequences  (MacKinnon, ... '