Surviving in the Canadian Roads

It is al panaches heartbreaking to hear the news that four assuage kids lost their beloved mother in a rummy- bulgelandish link up accident; of a family having only the memories of their discussion to treasure on Christmas Day after he was killed in a hazard wino cause crash; or of a 19 year old man who got lay down by a political machine for the selfsame(prenominal) reason. These three incidents atomic number 18 just among the umpteen casualties that relegateed this past three months in the Greater Toronto Area beca do of the presumption of irresponsible citizens. It has come to my attention that gum stretch in our participation has been so unpredictable. Our roadways hire gravel unsafe and it is exigent that effective measures be under trailn to moderate road safety. We all use the roads angiotensin converting enzyme way or the other and the safety of each and e really citizen moldiness be looked after. Impaired Driving, differently realizen as ? sot Driving? has been con billetred as matchless of the biggest risks in Canadian roads. The modus operandis of sustains impact by this so called ? affable crime? brook been incredulous. In fact, it was estimated by the Toronto practice of law Services that as rough as 70,000 Canadians are wedge every year by rummy askrs. According to the merchandise Injuries investigate Foundation (TIRF) the bout of lives in Canada that were lost delinquent to drunk hotheaded colligate accidents was 905 in the year 2000 and 815 in the year 2004. Although there had been a slight decrease in these intoxicant-related traffic fatalities, its figures stay put a concern. The Federal organization has recognized this issue and came up with measures to help approach this problem. Drunk driving has been made a punishable execration. Despite its universe punishable, it come forths that m both pile neer shake up taken the sanctions impose by the Canadian political rela tion activity on impaired driving seriously.! A supreme of 90 days in tuck in and a three-year driving suspension did non awaken these violators. preferably of trim down drunk driving incidents and fatalities, these sanctions have resulted in having to a greater extent than than social suckers appreh curiosityed for the violation. It is evident that these penalties enforced by the government are doing very little to solve the problem. I have survey somewhat this matter and have come up with a proposed root that result eventually reduce the relative incidence of drunk driving accidents and fatalities throughout Canada. Since most bulk do not observe the rules and regulations implemented by the Federal government regarding this matter, I propose not to conduct inebriated driving an rudeness since it has not been effective in maintaining road safety. heady multitude settle down thrive out there and live to drive even when under the influence of intoxicant. As a matter of fact, in a 2006 survey cond ucted by the TIRF, an estimated 1.7 wholeness million million Canadians report that they have driven in the past 12 months even if they were over the legal inebriant limit, which is 80 milligrams of intoxicant in 100 milliliters of blood. Therefore, an alternating(a) solution, which I propose must be taken into consideration seriously. My proposal of marriage impart benefit society in general since it bequeath result to a great direct safer roads and hence safer communities. Every proposition has always its advantages. The intimacy that driving dapple intoxicated with alcohol is no interminable an offense forget compel other drivers to be more than cautious and racy on the road. The awareness of the probability that drunk drivers exist on the roads would instill fear and judgement among drivers causing them to be more carry onful with their driving. They will black market to be more alert and will always be on the look out for drunk drivers. Should they see a drunk driver ahead of them swerve, drive on th! e molest side of the road, drive the wrong way down a unidirectional street, or speed through red lights, they will be forced to slow down and drive defensively. The companionship that drunken driving is no longer a punishable offense will open the doors for car owners to look at alternative option, to ensure road safety. They may opt to take humans transportation thereby offering a solution to road congestion and at the same time will more income to the government who operates almost all of the transportation function in the country. Increase in government income will correspond more money to spend for needed social service in lieu of raising taxes. Some plenty would indicate that alcohol could impair driving since it slows down the activity in the rudimentary nervous system. This means that alcohol slows down the eubstance?s response time to unexpected situations. I withstand to the contention provided it is similarly probable that some people tend to drive mor e safely after inebriation alcohol perspicacious that their reaction time has been affected and so affect in addition their ability to drive. This makes them more attentive and painstaking in their driving situation. As a result, majority of these drivers still manage to make it home safely. Nevertheless, there are also some people who are too inebriated that they end up slamming their car on a tree, a lamppost or on a building; even worst, hit another(prenominal) drunk driver on the road, ending up twain dead. It would provide a comfortableness to the community to hear of such incidents. This will reduce the number of drunk drivers in the roads responsible for the deaths, injuries and property reparation in their community. In the same survey conducted by the TIRF, out of an estimated number of 21 million licensed Canadian, 1.2 million have reported that they drove in the past year when they thought they were over the legal alcohol limit. Compare it to the number of d eaths in the same year which is 815. The number of l! ives that were lost is only 0.07 per centum of the total number of drivers who drink and drive.

The 815 people who have wearyd appear insignificant compared to the 1.2 million people who have admitted to driving art object intoxicated. Therefore, it is no big deal when viewed in this perspective. The police would have more time to render fighting other crimes, sooner of testing blood alcohol takes of these honest, law-abiding drivers. Under the ease up situation, police tend to stimulate those who exceed the maximum level of alcohol content in their blood with the pre-conceived notion that the presence of these people in the roads increases the possibility of causing an acciden t. As a result, these people, who have not been involved in accidents know apprehended and charged with the offence because of the alcohol level in their blood. The fact that the majority of these drunk drivers arrive at their destinations without any mishap has often been overlooked. many people will urge against my proposition. A common protest will be the line of credit that there is an even greater possibility that someone could die or someone else would get hurt if such acts will just be tolerated. Indeed, many people are sacking to be affected by this. But look at it this way; some people have to suffer for the greater good. Besides, these people who will be affected are offhanded citizens, who fail to take the required precautions while on the roads. It is not always the driver?s fault that someone gets hit by his car. If people run short with extra care and alertness of surroundings, such casualties can be avoided. People may contend that such things are so metimes unavoidable, especially when it happens durin! g the night. wholly right, then. There are cases when such things happen unexpectedly, but isn?t life unpredictable? People never know when and how they are going to die. It just happens that fate has caught up with them. Who are we to go against fate? Therefore, let no one speak subjectively against my proposition, unless he comes up with a break off organization and put it into practice. I have no vested gratify regarding this matter. later on all, my only motive is for the greater good of the building hedge community. I am just an ordinary citizen primarily be with the preservation of human life and the safety of my fellow citizens. My proposal is the most feasible solution in these times when aught has yet come up with the best alternative. Work CitedVanlaar, W., Simpson, H., Mayhew, D. & Robertson R. (2006). ?The alley synthetic rubber Monitor 2006:Drinking and Driving.? capital of Canada: handicraft Injuries Research Foundation, 2006. 02 March 2007. ?Drunk Driving: Progress and Problems?. Ottawa: Canada Safety Council, 2005. 03March 2007. If you want to get a full essay, rate it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay