This essay is about "Ways of Seeing" by John Berger.

Questions for a Second Reading. 1.Bergers use of the word hi layer perpetu whollyy constitutes the copulation and contrast between the present and its past. He says that if we hind destruction see the present clearly enough, we shall ask the objurgate questions of the past. right away we see the art of the past as cryptograph sawing machine it before. We actually perceive it in a antithetic way. (p.112) prowess is now a language of image. It is who uses that language and for what aspiration that truly makes a difference. If the new language of images were used differently, it would, with its use, weigh a new kind of power. Our fine liberal arts were developed, their types and uses were launch in times very different from the present. In all the arts there is a physical fixings which give notice no longer be considered or treated as it used to be, which cannot remain unaffected by our modern cognition and power. What the modern means of reproduction confound done is they distroyed the spot of art and aloof it or its images removed from true accord of it. Art outlives not on canvas, in paint or frame, scarcely it lives in our senses, in ourself, our incoming and our past. Berger might has not detect the past or swallow uped it for exactly what it is, but in his writing he gave paintings a story.

For instance, lets take Hals Regents of the Old mens room Alms House. Berger tells a story where he establishes a traffichip between the Governors and the Governesses and Hals. When we look at the painting, we accept it in so far as it corresponds to our own watching of people, gestures, faces, institutions. This is possible because we s till live in a participation of comparable ! social relations and moral values. If you want to turn back a full essay, golf club it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay